Open letter demanding a fair selection process for the next IMF managing director

To governors and executive directors of the IMF,

The ‘gentleman’s agreement’, which has ensured that the IMF managing director has, for 75 years, been European and the World Bank president a US national, is undemocratic, illegitimate, and rooted in neo-colonial principles.  

International institutions currently face a crisis of legitimacy, as faith in the multilateral system of global governance withers. If the IMF and World Bank want to present themselves as modern institutions capable of tackling today’s challenges, it is imperative that they become democratic and accountable to all of those they represent.

Despite over 150 civil society organisations and individuals calling on the World Bank for an open, transparent and merit-based leadership succession process earlier this year, the US candidate David Malpass was appointed president of the World Bank. This, exacerbated by the fact that the only other nominee cited pressure from “other governments” as the reason for withdrawing, brought global governance into further disrepute.

It is high time to end the ‘gentleman’s agreement’ and replace it with a genuinely open, democratic, merit-based, transparent process, that goes beyond rhetorical commitment, and allows candidates, regardless of nationality, to be put forward on an equal footing. In line with longstanding civil society demands, we believe that no country – or indeed bloc of countries – should wield excessive power in this process. Instead, the winning candidate should gain support of a majority of both voting shares and member states.

The opaque nature of the selection process must be scrapped in favour of a transparent one that allows space for public scrutiny of candidates. This should entail a commitment to ending the convention that candidates must be supported by the government of their home country – which restricts applications – as well as public interviews, transparent voting procedures, and sufficient time to allow for deliberation.

Building on the IMF’s candidate profile, a clear job description and comprehensive set of qualifications should be drafted and made public. This should include the ability to defend the independence of the IMF from its powerful members and stand up for less powerful nations. It is vital that candidates are well-versed in problems experienced by low- and middle-income countries.

Recognising the IMF as a specialised agency of the United Nations, it is essential that candidates are committed to embedding the IMF in agreed international frameworks and norms, such as international human rights law, and are dedicated to building on the IMF’s recent commitments on economic inequality, social spending, gender inequality, and climate change.

The IMF leadership race coincides with the 75th anniversary of the creation of the Bretton Woods Institutions. 75 years is enough – It is time to end the ‘gentleman’s agreement’.

Signed,

  1. ActionAid International 
  2. Adam Tooze, Director of the European Institute, Columbia University
  3. Africa Development Interchange Network (ADIN) 
  4. African Coalition on Green Growth 
  5. Afrodad 
  6. AfroLeadership 
  7. Age International  
  8. Alan Cibils, Professor of Political Economy, Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento 
  9. Alexander Kentikelenis, Assistant Professor of Political Economy and Sociology, Bocconi University 
  10. Alliance Sud 
  11. Arab NGOs Network for Development
  12. Asia Monitor Resource Centre
  13. Association for Promotion Sustainable Development
  14. Bank Information Center Europe 
  15. Bilge Erten, Assistant Professor, Northeastern University 
  16. Bonn Juego, University Teacher and Researcher 
  17. Bretton Woods Project 
  18. Buendnis Eine Welt Schleswig-Holstein   
  19. CAFOD (Catholic Agency for Overseas Development) 
  20. CAFSO-WRAG for Development  
  21. CEE Bankwatch Network 
  22. CEKOR (Center for ecology and sustainable development), Serbia 
  23. Center of Conjuncture and Economic Policy of the Economic Institute of the University of Campinas  
  24. Centre National de coopération au développement CNCD-11.11.11 
  25. CESR  
  26. Christian Aid  
  27. Civil Society Coalition on Sustainable Development  
  28. Common Wealth  
  29. Community and Family aid, Ghana
  30. Congregation of Our Lady of Charity of the Good Shepherd 
  31. Daniela Gabor, Professor of Economics and Macro-Finance, University of the West of England.
  32. DAWN 
  33. Debt Justice Norway 
  34. DemNet Hungary 
  35. Democratic Culture, Argentina  
  36. Diane Elson, Emeritus Professor, Department of Sociology, University of Essex
  37. Dr Catherine Bernard, Founder-director of SERFAC
  38. Dr. Jeff Powell, University of Greenwich 
  39. Društvo EnaBanda 
  40. Ecumenical Academy, Czech Republic
  41. Erlassjahr.de
  42. Eurodad 
  43. Fight Inequality Alliance  
  44. Financial Justice Ireland  
  45. Free Trade Union Development Center
  46. Friends of the Earth US 
  47. GADN  
  48. Gestos, Brazil  
  49. Global Alliance for Tax Justice 
  50. Global Justice Now  
  51. Health Poverty Action 
  52. Help Age International  
  53. Ilene Grabel, Distinguished University Professor, University of Denver 
  54. International Trade Union Confederation  
  55. International Women’s Rights Action Watch Asia Pacific
  56. Isabel Ortiz, Director Global Social Justice Program, IPD Columbia University 
  57. Jason Hickel, senior lecturer, Goldsmith’s University
  58. John Miller, Professor of Economics, Wheaton College, Norton, MA 
  59. John Weeks, Professor Emeritus SOAS, University of London
  60. Jubilee Australia 
  61. Jubilee Debt Campaign UK  
  62. Jubilee Germany
  63. JusticeMakers Bangladesh  
  64. Khartoum Sudan 
  65. Latinddad 
  66. Madhyam (New Delhi)  
  67. Nancy Alexander
  68. National Society of Conservationists – Friends of the Earth Hungary 
  69. New Economics Foundation  
  70. Nigeria Private Sector Alliance  
  71. Oikos – Cooperação e Desenvolvimento 
  72. Olive Community Development Initiatives, Nigeria
  73. Oxfam  
  74. Peter O’Flynn, Researcher, Development Finance and Impact Investing, Institute of Development Studies 
  75. Phenix Center for Economic and Informatics Studies, Jordan 
  76. Professor Sir Richard Jolly, Research Associate, Institute of Development Studies 
  77. Radanar Ayar Association from Myanmar 
  78. Radhika Balakrishnan, Rutgers University 
  79. Religious of the Sacred Heart of Mary NGO 
  80. Rethinking Economics  
  81. Rick Rowden PhD
  82. SDGs Kenya Forum 
  83. Sisters of Charity Federation 
  84. Society for International Development  
  85. Stamp Out Poverty 
  86. Stephany Griffith- Jones, Emeritus Professorial Fellow, Institute of Development Studies, Sussex University 
  87. Tax Justice Network 
  88. The Feminist Task Force
  89. The Hunger Project 
  90. Thomas Stubbs, Senior Lecturer in International Relations 
  91. Trademark Belfast 
  92. UndebtedWorld 
  93. Urgewald
  94. VIVAT International
  95. War on Want  
  96. Wemos 
  97. Willow Empowerment For Grassroot Development Initiative  
  98. Womankind Worldwide 
  99. Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom  
  100. Youthhubafrica 
  101. Zimbabwe United Nations Association 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s